Mindful of how very many pinks I have, as discovered in the great stash re-org, I left Bare with Me at the store, but got all the others.
Nail board gals noticed that Teddy Bare looks a lot like Chanel Particulière (more on that in a bit); it's a lovely milk chocolate creme that covered in two coats.
Bare to Wear is a greige creme that took three coats (the display said these were "medium coverage" which I thought meant they'd maybe be a little sheer, but all were two or three coats to get bottle color, so not so sheer at all). This was my favorite of these five.
Bare in Mind, a three-coater, is rumored to be quite similar to Chanel Jade Rose, something I cannot confirm because I didn't think Jade Rose was worth the money so did not buy it either time around. I can tell you Bare in Mind is a warm pink with a hint of bright pink shimmer that shows up in the bottle but is shy when on the nail.
Truth or Bare, a brownish peach creme, also took three coats. This was my least favorite of the five, though I could see it looking great on someone with a darker and/or yellower complexion than I have.
Bare Necessity surprised me. It's a brownish clay creme, and I thought it would be too orange against my skintone, but I quite liked it once I put it on my nails (only took two coats).
And now it's time to address the Teddy Bare/Particulière issue. I didn't get Particulière when it first came out but ordered it months later, after deciding that yes, I did like taupes that much and no, there really weren't any dead on dupes. Is there one now? Is Teddy Bare the polish to fill that gap? Let's see:
They're close, no doubt, but I can see a difference in many lighting conditions—Teddy Bare is ever so slightly cooler/greyer in tone. Would a muggle (or my husband) notice? No, I would bet not. If I didn't have Particulière I think I'd be perfectly happy with Teddy Bare, which retails for $4.49 at CVS compared to $23 for the Chanel.
0 Yorumlar